More Than 3000 Academics Sign Pro-Ayers Petition is an interesting little article. Why would so many profs rally behind this guy? One possible answer: they feel that his "character assassination" is a threat to free speech on college campii:the attacks on and the character assassination of Ayers threaten the university as a space of open inquiry and debate, and threaten schools as places of compassion, imagination, curiosity, and free thought. They serve as warnings that anyone who voices perspectives and advances questions that challenge orthodoxy and political power may become a target, and this, then, casts a chill over free speech and inquiry and the spirit of democracy.Doesn't this sound just a tad anarchist to you? "Challenge orthodoxy?"
But aside from that, they can be anarchists--it's a free country. No one is trying to take that away from them. (Although I am still laughing at the melodramatic phrase "casts a chill"--let me go get my sweater....)
The problem is the double standard. "We have the right to challenge your orthodoxy, but don't challenge our orthodoxy." Or "We have the right to free speech, except those who disagree with us."
Plus the sad irony here is that those who lean more to the left do have control of academia. How many professors are safe to openly teach at a public university a Pro-Life viewpoint or Intellegent Design as part of a Biology course? Do they have free speech rights?
Just wondering....well, back to my laundry. Sorry to get so distracted.




